Internet Car & Truck of the Year Winners

March 3rd, 2010

            It’s a sign of the times. Winners of the Internet Car and Truck of the Year were announced at the Chicago auto Show recently.

           There were two sets. The Pros (auto web site writers) chose the 2010 Mazda3 and the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox as the car and truck of the year respectively.

           Consumers, who could go on the Web site and vote for their favorite, chose the  2010 Chevrolet Camaro and the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox.

            Except for the muscular Camaro, this is sort of groundbreaking stuff.  My point is that practicality has arrived. I’ve seen car of the year awards go to vehicles that only a handful of the public could actually afford. And the truck awards in the past have gone to vehicles that were too big, burned too much fuel and cost too much for real people but not this time.

The Mazda3 is a midsize fuel efficient sedan that can be had in a couple of practical body styles. And the Equinox doesn’t have three rows of seats, who really needs that third row anyway, and it is available with a gas sipping four cylinder engine.

Pipe dreams are on their way out when it comes to car and truck of the year winners and pragmatism is in.

Oh, I was a judge in the contest and looking forward to doing it again next year.

 

Frank S. Washington

 

 

 

 

 

Toyota: The Honeymoon’s Over

February 27th, 2010

It’s just impossible to say how the Toyota recall debacle will end up but it’s hard to believe the Japanese automaker will come out the other end with its sterling reputation intact.

In a phrase, the honeymoon is over. The only question is just how much damage will Toyota suffer and how much money will it lose from a recall that involves more than 8 million vehicles.

Worse, there are reports that say executives knew of sudden acceleration, braking and steering problems with Toyota’s products years before the company was forced to recall the vehicles.

There seems to be no end to the negative stories. The latest in Atlanta, a “recalled” Toyota Corolla crashed through the front door of a home when it unexpectedly accelerated.

We’ve seen the automotive unthinkable: Chrysler and GM bankruptcies, a government takeover of two of the three domestic automakers and now Toyota which once seemed unassailable being reduced to rudimentary ordinariness.

I don’t even want to think about what’s next.

 

Frank S. Washington

Chicago to Host Car, Truck Awards

November 17th, 2009

 The Internet Car and Truck of the Year Awards has joined the Chicago Auto Show.

Awards for best car, best truck and best journalist will be presented during the Chicago Auto Show Media Days on Feb. 10-11, 2010.

Awards will be presented for Internet Car of the Year, Internet Truck of the Year, Consumer Internet Car of the Year, and Consumer Internet Truck of the Year. Winners of the Internet Automotive Journalism Contest will also be announced at the show.

Voting will be open until December 11th. The public can go to: www.internetcarandtruckoftheyear.com and cast their vote.

The Internet Car and Truck of the Year is “Where Internet Pros and Average Joes Pick the Car and Truck of the Year,” said founder and chief organizer Keith Griffin.

A jury of 12 automotive writers is simultaneously selecting its top car and truck (including SUVs, pickups and crossovers) at the same time consumers are voting on their top picks in the same categories.

The Internet Car and Truck of the Year Awards) have become an official part of The Chicago Auto Show www.ChicagoAutoShow.com.

“It’s the first time Internet-savvy consumers will have the opportunity to select their Car and Truck of the Year in one place at a website not dominated by manufacturer advertising. It’s only logical that we associate with the Chicago Auto Show, because it is the nation’s largest consumer auto show,” said Griffin.

 

 

 

Duh, Texting While Driving is Dangerous

October 28th, 2009

The vast majority of U.S. drivers believes handheld texting while driving is very dangerous and should be banned nationwide, according to a national survey. 

The survey showed that 86 percent of U.S. drivers believe handheld texting while driving is “very dangerous” and 93 percent support a nationwide ban on texting.  At the same time, only 42 percent of respondents believe drivers would stop texting behind the wheel if the practice was banned.  However, more than 75 percent believe there would be more compliance if hands-free or voice-activated technologies were widely available.

The online survey was conducted September 18-21 by Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates on behalf of the Ford Motor Company.  Ford commissioned the survey as part of its efforts to understand driver perceptions related to distracted driving.  Ford last week endorsed a proposed nationwide ban on handheld texting introduced by Senator Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY).

“Research shows that activity that draws drivers’ eyes away from the road for an extended period while driving, such as text messaging, substantially increases the risk of accidents,” said Jim Vondale, director of Ford’s Automotive Safety Office. “That is why we support a nationwide ban on handheld texting while driving and why Ford has developed hands-free and voice-activated technologies to allow drivers to remain connected, but to do so while keeping their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road.”

The survey shows that 67 percent of drivers said they believed voice-activated technology is a safe alternative to texting, and 76 percent said such a feature would be an appealing feature in a car.

The survey results come as the U.S. Department of Transportation is scheduled to host a summit on driver distraction in Washington, D.C., next week.  

Franks Note: Some years ago, a study found the people talking on cell phones while driving had the same reaction time as someone legally drunk. Not a lot happened; let’s hope this time response to the dangers of texting while driving is better.

DUI: Punish Cars or Deal With People?

October 28th, 2009

 While a recent study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) indicates growing public support for the use of ignition interlocks on the cars of drunk drivers, a growing body of justice officials and policymakers say the trend is actually dealing with the people–not just the cars–when it comes to mitigating the social and financial costs of the DUI epidemic.

The IIHS report indicates that two-thirds of their survey respondents think the idea of “advanced technology” to stop drunk drivers from operating their cars when intoxicated is “good” or “very good,” though only 40 percent indicated they would be willing to install the technology on their own vehicles. Today, approximately 180,000 interlocks are in use nationwide. And that number is at the core of the debate: Estimates indicate that even in New Mexico, the state with the strictest ignition interlock laws, only 32 percent of offenders required to install interlocks actually do so. The resources to ensure enforcement of the sanction are simply lacking. More than 1.4 million people are arrested for driving under the influence each year, making it the most common cause of arrest in the U.S.

State 24/7 Sobriety Programs Shift the Focus to the Offenders

South Dakota is leading the paradigm shift from strictly sanctioning cars to changing the behavior of offenders long-term. The state has seen an unprecedented 65 percent drop in the rate of alcohol-related traffic fatalities in the last four years, with accompanying reductions in the prison and jail populations. Former South Dakota Attorney General Larry Long, who conceived of and implemented the state’s award-winning 24/7 Sobriety Project in 2005, says the shift is centered on addressing what he calls the root cause of the criminality, which is the alcohol abuse and addiction. “Rather than just ‘requiring’ sobriety, we incorporated stringent testing to ensure it,” says Long. The program mandates that all DUI offenders be sober 24/7, not just when they drive. “What we’ve seen is that effective monitoring, coupled with short but immediate jail time for a violation, is resulting in very high compliance rates,” he says. “We are substantially reducing the burden that these offenders place on their families and their communities.”

Louder Electric Cars and Hybrids

October 28th, 2009

 

Toshiyuki Tabata spent 30 years as a Nissan Motor Co. engineer trying to make gasoline-powered cars quieter. Now he’s consulting music composers to make electric cars noisier — and safer.

Electric and hybrid cars, with little or no engine noise, are lauded for their silence, yet some groups including advocates for the blind say pedestrians may fail to notice them approaching.

To address those safety concerns, transportation agencies in the United States and Japan may mandate artificial sounds for the vehicles.

“We fought for so long to get rid of that noisy engine sound,” said Tabata, Nissan’s noise and vibration expert. “With electric cars, we took a completely different approach and listened to composers talk music theory.”

Carmakers including Nissan and Toyota Motor Corp., manufacturer of the Prius gasoline-electric hybrid, are researching sound as more silent models come to market.

Nissan will start selling its Leaf electric car next year in the U.S., Japan and Europe next year, while General Motors Co. plans to introduce its extended range electric Chevy Volt in late 2010. Toyota will introduce a battery-powered vehicle in 2012.